Web marketing services

What you are buying, in plain terms.

Web marketing services means someone else running the channels that bring you customers through a browser — search, content, earned coverage, paid media, email and the site itself — and reporting honestly on what each produced. This page covers what is in that, what a month of it looks like, and what is not included, because that last one is where most engagements go wrong.

7

Years the average client stays, with no long-term contract

0

Junior account managers between you and the people doing the work

20,700 +

Client keywords in Google's top three, measured in Ahrefs

16

Published case studies, with the figures a prospect can re-derive

// What Is Included

What a web marketing service actually delivers

Six things, and the useful part of each is what it produces rather than what it is called. A scope written in nouns is really just a list, whereas a scope written in outputs is something you can hold somebody to.

Search visibility

Technical fixes, content built for queries that have been screened for real commercial intent, and the earned coverage that makes the rankings hold. Produces: position band movement you can see keyword by keyword, and the pages that caused it.

Paid media

Account structure, keyword and audience selection, landing pages, and the ongoing job of cutting what does not convert. Produces: cost per inquiry by campaign, and a shrinking list of things you are paying for that never worked.

Content

The pages and articles that answer what your buyers ask before they are ready to buy, written by people who have read your product rather than a brief about it. Produces: assets that keep earning after they are published, which is the only kind worth commissioning.

Conversion and analytics

Tracking that is actually correct, then the unglamorous work of improving what the traffic does when it arrives. Produces: a conversion rate that moves, and reporting you can hand to a finance director without a translator.

The website itself

We build and maintain sites as part of the marketing rather than referring it out, which means a fix identified on Monday can ship on Monday. Produces: no change request queue between finding a problem and solving it, which is worth more than it sounds.

Someone senior who knows your account

You work with the principals. There is no account manager relaying questions to a delivery team, which is the arrangement that makes most agency relationships feel slow for reasons nobody can quite name.

// Process

What a month actually looks like

Not the pitch version. This is the shape of a normal month once an engagement is running, including the parts that are quiet.

Work happens against a short list, not a long one

Two or three things that matter, finished, rather than fifteen started. The single most common thing we inherit is a plan broad enough that no individual item ever completed, which reports beautifully and produces nothing.

Data in →

The paid side gets touched weekly, the organic side monthly

Paid decays fast and rewards frequent small corrections. Organic work rewards patience and punishes fiddling, so it moves on a longer cycle. An agency touching both at the same cadence is doing one of them wrong.

Strategy →

Reporting says what did not work

Position bands rather than averages, cost per inquiry by channel, branded split from non-branded, and an explicit note on what is not yet attributable. Some months the leading indicators move and the revenue does not, and the report says so — that is the month a summary would have hidden.

Execute →

The mix changes without a renegotiation

The proportion of the work going to each channel shifts with what the data says. That is why the fee is flat rather than line-itemed per service: a scope that has to be renegotiated to follow the evidence usually just does not follow it.

∞ Loop
// Reading A Scope

The questions that tell you whether a scope means anything

Ask these of us and of anyone else you are considering. They are not gotchas — they are the questions whose answers actually differ between a real scope and a well-designed list, and every one of them is answerable in a sentence by anybody who intends to do the work.

"What does this produce, and when would I see it?"

Every line should have an output and a rough timescale attached. "Ongoing SEO" is not a deliverable. "Technical fixes and eight pages built against screened keywords, with band movement expected from month three" is one, and it can be checked.

"Who is actually doing it?"

Ask for the name and ask whether that person is in the meetings. Agencies that sell with principals and deliver with juniors do not lie about this if asked directly, because the honest answer is on the org chart.

"What is not included?"

The single most useful question on this list, and the one that most often produces a pause. Ad spend, in nearly every case, and often photography, video, translation and development beyond some threshold. If the answer is "nothing, it is all included", the scope has not really been written yet.

"What would make you tell me to stop?"

A service worth buying has a version of "this channel is not going to work for you". If nobody can name one, you are buying activity rather than judgment, and you will find out which in about nine months.

"How do you report a bad quarter?"

Ask to see a real report, redacted. The tell is whether it contains anything that did not work. Reporting that only shows movement in the right direction is not reporting, it is retention.

"What happens to the work if we leave?"

Content, links, tracking configuration, account access and the site itself should be yours and should stay yours. Anyone whose results are hosted on their own domains, or whose ad accounts are not in your name, has built a reason for you not to leave that has nothing to do with performance.

// From the archive

We have been arguing about outsourcing this since 2010

Six passages from our own archive, verbatim and dated. They are on a page selling services because they argue for doing a fair amount of it yourself, which is still what we tell people whose situation calls for it.

There are a number of other things you can do to get your SEO process going in-house. Submit a sitemap to the search engines so that their bots will be able to crawl your site easily. Make sure your site has an understandable hierarchy and that each page is reachable from one or more static links. Use relevant keywords in your image metatags. And ensure that your title elements and ALT attributes are descriptive and accurate. Fix or remove broken links. Make sure each page has a reasonable number of links.

These practices won't take an inordinate amount of time, and Google has a lot of webmaster tools that show you exactly what to do to improve your site's search engine rankings. If you try the basics and your site does not improve in the rankings, and you have fresh, original content, then it may be time to call in an expert on SEO. But in a lot of cases, if you approach it methodically you can do wonders for your site's search engine rankings (and Google PageRanks) in-house. In fact, if you have summer interns, it would be a great project for one of them.

The last sentence has not aged well and is quoted intact rather than trimmed, because a quote edited to flatter the argument it is being used for is worth nothing. Handing search to an intern in 2026 is how a site ends up with a generated content library and a link profile that needs cleaning. Everything before it we still stand behind, with the threshold moved.

The sites that provide links to you give search engines context about your site's content, and can give the search engine algorithm indications of its quality. The links have to be relevant, however. A link from a great website that has absolutely nothing to do with your site's content won't do you much, if any, good. Link exchanges and partnerships that are developed strictly for the sake of providing back links - relevant or not - dilute the quality of the links and violate Google's webmaster guidelines. Your search engine rankings may drop drastically as a result of using these schemes. Links need to be obtained the old fashioned way: by earning them with good, unique content.

Sixteen years on this needs no correction, which is unusual for anything written about links in 2010. The practical version for a buyer is short: if a proposal quotes you a number of links per month at a price per link, it is describing the schemes in the middle of this paragraph, whatever it calls them.

The "sweet spot" I'm looking for is keywords that are relevant to my site that have search volumes in the tens of thousands rather than the hundreds of thousands per month. The keywords "windmill energy" and "windmill electricity" look promising. They come in at around 10,000 searches locally and globally, so I have a better chance of competing, and yet they're keywords that are relevant and could eventually become competitive, hopefully after my site has worked its way to the top of the search engine rankings.

The tool named here is gone and the instinct is exactly what we still charge for. Winnable beats large, and a target list of head terms nobody can reach is the commonest thing we find in an inherited plan.

Writing good web content is work, and you may not have the time or inclination to do it. That's when you consider outsourcing. You already know that your website needs to be updated regularly, and if you don't have someone on your staff who's gung-ho to do this (and can be the alloted the necessary work time), then you should consider hiring someone to do it.

Typo included, and the test in it is still the right one. Not "can we afford to outsource this" but "is there somebody here who will actually do it, with the hours protected". Most content that never appears was assigned to a person who was never given the time.

If you hire a freelancer or go through an agency, it is important to clearly define an initial job for the writer. Try to be as specific as possible as to tone, topic, length, and how densely keywords or key phrases need to be included. Consider their first assignment a test run and see how well it meshes with your needs. You may want to keep this person on hand regularly because updating your site needs to be regular. It almost doesn't matter how often you update - though the bigger tech blogs are updated more than once a day - but regular updating is a big plus and it builds up your site's archive of valuable information while you're building PageRank and ascending in the search engine rankings.

Keyword density has expired; the rest is the brief we still write. "It almost doesn't matter how often you update, but regular updating is a big plus" is the sentence that should decide the size of a content line in any scope, and it argues for less per month than most agencies would like to sell you.

Ultimately, the success of a site depends on your ability to effectively communicate with readers. There is no substitute for content that people like, though there are things you can do to tip more traffic your way.

Written as the opening caveat to a post that then lists a dozen tools, which is the correct order and the opposite of how this is usually sold. Every tool in that list is now dead or unrecognizable. The caveat is not.

Around 700 posts, published since 2003

Read the archive
// Straight Answers

What people ask before they commission this

The questions from a first call, answered the way we would answer them on the phone.

What do web marketing services cost?

Two numbers people conflate. Media spend goes straight to Google or Meta and is yours. The cost of the work is separate — a salary, a freelancer, or a retainer. Ours is a flat monthly fee with no long-term contract, and the mix inside it moves with the data rather than with what was scoped in month one. We would rather quote against your numbers than publish a table that fits nobody.

Do I have to buy all of it?

No, and you probably should not. The most common sensible starting point is one channel run properly plus the tracking to prove it, and the second most common is fixing the site before anything is pointed at it. Buying six channels at once is the standard way a first-year budget disappears without producing evidence about any of them.

Is there a contract?

No long-term one. The average client stays about seven years, and the reason we can say that is that none of them have to. Notice periods are the industry's substitute for retention and they are a bad one — an agency that needs twelve months of lock-in is telling you what it expects month nine to look like.

How soon will we see something?

Paid can produce inquiries in the first week. Conversion work on the site can move within a few weeks because it applies to traffic you already have. Organic typically shows band movement within a quarter and clicks in the second or third. A proposal promising organic results in thirty days is describing paid traffic or a penalty being lifted.

Who owns the work?

You do — content, links, tracking configuration, ad accounts, the site. Accounts are set up in your name from the start rather than migrated later, which is a small administrative difference at the beginning and an enormous one if you ever leave.

Do you work with our in-house team?

Most of our better arrangements are exactly that rather than a handover. The split that works is usually product knowledge in-house and the long-feedback-loop work outside, which is the argument in the 2010 passage above with the threshold moved.

// Results

Numbers don't lie.

16
Case studies with published numbers
19
Client brands
12
Countries the work has run in
22
Press features
TMS Brain Health
81.8%
Of all site traffic from organic search
Monthly organic users, against March 2020
2,000%
Phone-call conversions from organic search
52%
Timeline: Mar 2020 – Jan 2023 · #1 in LA & Santa Monica for TMS therapy
Utopia Management
247
Keywords in Google's top three, across city-level local search
Organic visibility, up 12.5 points
26.61%
Of the previous year's monthly organic users
280%
Timeline: 679 local terms tracked with the map pack — and still seven times the nearest competitor in 2026
Link Building & Digital PR
DR 82
Average authority across 81 earned editorial placements
DR 90+ placements
33 of 81
Featured in
CNN · Forbes · U.S. News
Timeline: Healthline, Nasdaq, Yahoo! Finance, Seattle Times & more
Budget Trucks (budgettrucks.com.au)
440%
Organic traffic against the penalty floor — an all-time high
Weekly organic sessions under the penalty
~1,300
Weekly organic sessions after the fix
~5,700
Timeline: Oct 2011 – Nov 2014 — twelve months suppressed, then the best weeks the site had ever recorded
SNS Nails
49.92%
Organic visibility — three times the nearest competitor
Monthly organic traffic, against the starting level
440%
Keywords in Google's top three
61
Timeline: Jun 2022 – Jun 2024 — up from 3% visibility, with nothing lost or declined in the top three
Budget Rent a Car (budget.com.au)
+20.6%
Organic users, year over year — 640,088 against 530,730
Australian-locale sessions
+696%
Bounce rate on organic traffic
27.6%
Timeline: Jun–Oct 2014 against the same four months in 2013 — the audience got bigger and it got local
Selby Acoustics (selby.com.au)
24.52%
Organic visibility — first in the category, ahead of JB Hi-Fi
Keywords in Google's top three
228
Estimated organic traffic
+174%
Timeline: Aug 2023 – Aug 2026 — up 11.5 visibility points while JB Hi-Fi, Officeworks and Harvey Norman all lost ground
On Campus Marketing (rhl.org)
+61.0%
Unique visitors from organic search, year over year
Visits from non-paid search
+49.0%
Selling-season window, measured a year apart
13 days
Timeline: May 2013 against May 2012 — the move-in selling season, non-paid search only
My Site Buddy (mysitebuddy.ai)
20
Active development days for a build costed at six months of senior work
Manual estimate
820–1,060 hrs
Shipped
120+ pages
Timeline: 15 Jul – 12 Aug 2026 · 361 commits, 9 concurrent workstreams, 11 releases — every one approved by a person before production
Ross Metals (rossmetals.com)
33
Keywords at number one — gold, chain, wire and permanent jewelry
Organic visibility, up from 0.40%
15.30%
Top-three rankings lost in twelve months
0
Timeline: Jul 2025 – Aug 2026 — about 3,900 searches a month held at position one, including "wholesale gold" at $3.72 a click
Isentia (isentia.com)
+61.4%
Organic sessions, year over year
Contact form submissions
+76%
Form completion rate, up from 8.1%
10.6%
Timeline: Aug–Sep 2015 against the same weeks a year earlier, across ten markets
George Clinical (georgeclinical.com)
+286%
Monthly sessions, January 2015 to August 2018
Organic share of all sessions
57%
Contact inquiries from organic search
55%
Timeline: January 2015 to August 2018 — organic finished as the largest channel, ahead of every other source combined
Maine Cottage (mainecottage.com)
80 points
Swing in year-over-year traffic growth, inside twelve months
Year-over-year traffic at the start
-40%
Year-over-year traffic twelve months on
+40%
Timeline: Jan–Oct 2013 finished +14.7% on visits and +18.3% on unique visitors
GoPromotional (gopromotional.co.uk)
1,682
Keywords at number one in Google UK — 240% of Vistaprint, 510% of 4imprint
Keywords in the top three
2,894
Keywords on page one
4,166
Timeline: Of 8,027 tracked — first on every band, and first in the category since 2010
Expedia Japan (expedia.co.jp)
20
Brand terms at number one on Yahoo Japan — every one tracked
Brand terms at number one on Google Japan
17 of 20
Generic travel terms on page one of Yahoo Japan
17
Timeline: May 2010 — including 海外ホテル, "overseas hotels", at number one on Yahoo and number two on Google
Private Jet Charter (privatejetscharter.net)
8
Country sites run at once — and every one of them grew
Average growth across the seven country sites
+77%
Germany, the fastest of them
+123%
Timeline: Eight markets in six languages — with the localized sites holding visitors two to three times longer than the global one
// Testimonials

What people say about working with us

We have been working with John and Web Moves for 14 years and the results have been astounding. John is a straight shooter — if he says he can do it, you can be confident he will deliver.
S

Shaun O'Brien

Owner, Selby Acoustics

Shaun was John's client

The great thing about John is his honesty — he tells it like it is. He is respected by major players including Microsoft and eBay, and media seek out his views: the front page of the Wall Street Journal among them.
P

Phil Leahy

Founder, MedCart Marketplace & Retail Global Events

Phil was John's client

John is the single most knowledgeable individual in the SEO industry I have ever worked with. Whether as a client, vendor or business partner, I cannot recommend him more highly.
M

Matthew Kligerman

Building Dirt — AI land development platform

John was Matthew's client

// Next Steps

Want a scope you can actually hold us to?

Send us your site and the three competitors who beat you most often. We will come back with what we would do first, what it would produce, what it would not cover, and what we would tell you not to bother with — which is usually the most useful part.